Treatment |
|
|
This book is not a completely scientific book that care only about the truth, nothing but the truth. I am an entrepreneur, and I care about truths that have practical uses. Things like, what works in the gene pool? What works in attracting females? What works in actually getting her? As we shall see, females’ consent is just one of the issues in gene pool survival and sexual achievements. For many males, that’s the biggest issue. Some males, like what you’ll become, have little problem getting females’ consent. Other males’ trick and force often get in the way even though the females want you. So I am not going to delve into a debate whether it’s the creationist or pure evolutionist that’s true. I don’t care. Both theories explain our world enough to make auspicious decisions. Let the geniuses that spend years doing it solve that’s problem. In fact, some models that I use in this book are not the most precise in the world, but “effectively” work for the purpose of discussion. Hence, I won’t delve into the details till such difference in the detail provides significant effective values. For example, unless necessary, I won’t differentiate between rational conscious deliberation, emotional preferences, or subconscious preferences. You can learn more about this in http://whybelievesareselffulfilling.com. I am trying to explain how humans behave. How exactly humans make their decisions is none of my concern for most discussions and vary greatly from humans to humans. In particular, humans do not consciously and rationally try to maximize their gene pool survival to the point of committing mutual genocide. Or at least they don’t usually pretend they do. We’re evil but we’re not that evil. Yeah right. Really… However, history in the past and present situation shows that humans “effectively” do that. The theory that humans rationally want to maximize their gene pool survival, even though incorrect, nevertheless predicts what humans do. They do that instinctively when they try to satisfy their emotion. Yet they behaves as they’ve rationally calculate the acts that’ll achieve that objectives with deadly accuracy. We call this phenomena emotional intelligence. Those “bad” humans often then pretend that their acts are caused by erroneous information or understanding to get their acts excused. Still, their error correlates well with their gene pool survival. Hence, assuming they deliberately make that error will still accurately predict their behavior. I’ll let you judge them. Again, the word “evil” here is subjective. I am simply using the commonly used standard where people attribute more responsibility to damaging acts that are done rationally rather than acts that are done emotionally and instinctively. These double standards pretty much wipe out the population of introvert rational variants to a mere 2% of humans population. This effectively put high IQ rationales as endangered variants of humans’ race that will go extinct unless something done to protect their existence; such as writing an e-book that they can understand. I am sure, preserving their kind will provide benefits for human kinds in the future… even more than in the past. Finally, free will is a much stronger causal predictor of one’s maliciousness than any race, gender or religious believe I can think of. Some people, like me for example, are quite tired to be nice. So they chose to shed of a teeny weenie little shred of their innocence and naiveness. |
|
Send comments, affiliate partnerships offer, and questions to webmaster@genepoolsurvivalguide.com. Read my first e-book on how to learn math at http://howtolearnmath.com
|